New Mexico justices reject move to void county's ICE contract for bond-funded facility

BY SourceMedia | MUNICIPAL | 01:57 PM EDT By Karen Pierog

The New Mexico Supreme Court denied a petition from the state attorney general to invalidate a contract between Otero County and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that generates revenue to pay off unrated bonds issued for a facility used to process individuals accused of civil immigration violations.

The high court's decision on Thursday ? rejecting a writ of mandamus and stay ? protects $14.33 million of outstanding Series 2007 jail project revenue bonds that depend on an intergovernmental service agreement with ICE, according to a statement from the county.

"A forced termination of the federal contract would have placed the county in immediate default on those obligations, threatening the financial stability of the county and the county's standing with bond markets," it added.

Attorney General Ra?l Torrez's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Torrez filed the petition earlier this month, contending Otero County did not obtain required approval from the state's Department of Finance and Administration and was apparently attempting to evade the prohibition of agreements involving the detention of individuals for federal civil immigration violations under the Immigrant Safety Act, which Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signed into law in February.

With the law not taking effect until May 20, Otero County commissioners on March 25 reapproved a five-year, $283 million ICE agreement after the state's justice department determined March 13 commission action on the contract was invalid due to a state Open Meetings Act violation. The move to replace a prior ICE agreement that expired on March 15 was aimed at avoiding a default on a nearly $5.26 million debt service payment due April 1.

On March 31, S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on the county's A-minus underlying gross tax receipts revenue bond rating to negative from stable, citing large general fund deficits that could be exacerbated by the loss of the ICE contract.

In general the bond market is volatile, and fixed income securities carry interest rate risk. (As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities.) Fixed income securities also carry inflation risk and credit and default risks for both issuers and counterparties. Unlike individual bonds, most bond funds do not have a maturity date, so avoiding losses caused by price volatility by holding them until maturity is not possible.

Lower-quality debt securities generally offer higher yields, but also involve greater risk of default or price changes due to potential changes in the credit quality of the issuer. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to loss.

Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully.

fir_news_article