ROI-Trump wants low long-term yields. Warsh's Fed won't be much help: McGeever

BY Reuters | ECONOMIC | 07:30 PM EST

By Jamie McGeever

ORLANDO, Florida, Feb 3 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump has been on a crusade to get the Federal Reserve to lower its policy rate, but his focus now seems to be shifting to long-term borrowing costs. Fed Chair nominee Kevin Warsh will struggle to deliver on that front.

This is bad news for the millions of borrowers facing high mortgage rates and, of course, Trump himself, whose fate in November's midterm elections could hinge on the "affordability crisis" facing voters ?across the country.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has spoken of wanting a 10-year yield with a 3% "handle," something seen only fleetingly during Trump's second term in office. The White House has blamed this on current Fed Chair Jerome Powell's unwillingness ?to lower rates aggressively, but that's a pretty specious argument.

In truth, the Fed only really has control over the short-term Fed funds rate. This is the base for longer-term ?business, credit card, auto, and mortgage loans, but the interest rate on these loans is primarily determined by the benchmark 10-year ?Treasury yield, over which the Fed has ?little control.

For example, Powell's Fed reduced the policy rate by 75 basis points late last year. Yet the 10-year yield drifted higher and is now around 4.30%. This has "steepened" the yield curve, or widened the gap between short- and ?long-dated yields.

In theory, a steeper curve reflects a healthy, more "normal" economy. But today's curve - the ?steepest in four years and still rising - may also signal that the longer-term inflation and rate outlook is darkening.

POLICY MISTAKE?

This disconnect reflects U.S. bonds' rising "term premium" - the extra yield investors demand for holding long-term Treasuries rather than short-term debt. That premium on 10-year Treasuries is near its highest level ?in over a decade.

Why is it rising? Largely because U.S. inflation and consumer expectations ?of future inflation are ?uncomfortably elevated, and the trajectory for public finances remains worrisome. Concerns about central bank independence haven't helped.

Interest rate futures markets expect a Warsh-led Fed to lower the fed funds rate by 50 basis points this year, but there is little indication that long-term rates will follow suit.

Does that mean investors are flagging ?a potential policy mistake, whereby further rate cuts at this point will ultimately lead to higher inflation - and higher rates - down the line?

Possibly, but, regardless, they seem unconvinced that Warsh, or any Fed Chair, will be able to push rates down across the curve.

THE BIG BET

Warsh, like Bessent, thinks otherwise. He argues that the key to cutting the policy rate, lowering inflation expectations, and ultimately getting longer-term borrowing costs down is an artificial intelligence-driven productivity boom. Even Powell recently signaled this could help the central bank meet its inflation target.

If this scenario plays out, mortgage rates could drop, giving a shot in the arm to the housing market and boosting the "wealth effect." Thirty-year mortgage rates have not dipped below ?6% since the ?summer of 2022. Trump, a former real estate tycoon, is as aware of this as anyone - and keen to do something about it.

Banking on an AI bailout is a gamble, however. Not only is the productivity-enhancing quality of AI yet to be proven, but it's also a stretch to assume that ?it will offset all the other forces putting upward pressure on inflation and long-term yields.

Washington's medium- to long-term fiscal health remains precarious. Wall Street is booming. Financial conditions are the loosest in four years, according to Goldman Sachs. Real growth is running at around 4%, based on the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model estimate, implying nominal growth of around 7%.

None of that suggests long-dated yields are about to decline much, or that the Fed funds rate should keep falling. A clear deterioration in economic data, a labor market swoon, or a geopolitical shock could flip the outlook, but that's probably not in the Bessent-Warsh playbook.

This may be why Trump, with one eye on the November midterms, has sought to target long-term rates directly, threatening to cap credit card interest rates at 10% and announcing that the ?government will buy more mortgage-backed securities.

But that doesn't mean he will refrain from pushing the new Fed Chair to help with the cause. The problem, of course, is that he can't do much.

(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)

Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, and X.

And listen to the Morning Bid daily ?podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app. Subscribe to hear Reuters journalists discuss the biggest news in markets and finance seven days a week.

(By Jamie McGeever; Editing by Marguerita Choy)

In general the bond market is volatile, and fixed income securities carry interest rate risk. (As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities.) Fixed income securities also carry inflation risk and credit and default risks for both issuers and counterparties. Unlike individual bonds, most bond funds do not have a maturity date, so avoiding losses caused by price volatility by holding them until maturity is not possible.

Lower-quality debt securities generally offer higher yields, but also involve greater risk of default or price changes due to potential changes in the credit quality of the issuer. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to loss.

Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully.

fir_news_article