Time To Bet Against Bad Banks--Now That The Bank Term Funding Program Has Expired And Fed Rate Cuts Are On Hold

BY Benzinga | ECONOMIC | 05/09/24 09:48 AM EDT

Why Bet Against Banks Now?

Two main reasons. First, the Federal Reserve's new, post Silicon Valley Bank collapse assistance program, The Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), has expired. And second, the Fed's first rate cut--initially expected in the first quarter of this year--has been pushed off indefinitely due to persistent inflation. So banks still have to compete for depositors with higher yielding money market funds.

A Simpler And Cheaper Approach

Last year around this time, I used a banking expert's approach to try to figure out which regional banks were most likely to go bust. I made money betting against Bank of Hawaii Corporation (BOH) and First Foundation, Inc. (FFWM) , and added more bearish positions after the crashes of PacWest Bancorp (now Banc of California) and Western Alliance Bancorporation

Betting Against More Regional Banks 🏦 In the wake of the $PACW and $WAL crashes, And after exiting bets against $BOH and $FFWM for gains of 80% and 200%, respectively. https://t.co/IVYBvKF31s pic.twitter.com/UCdAoq8Kfv

-- Portfolio Armor (@PortfolioArmor) May 4, 2023


I was going to pay the same analyst I used to update the spreadsheet we came up with with the latest data, but before doing so, I looked at the half dozen or so names that were ranked as the "worst" banks according to the banking expert's methodology, and checked how their share prices did over the last 12 months.

A couple had gone bust, but those were ones that were already in obvious trouble when we put the spreadsheet together. The others were all up significantly over the last 12 months. Apparently, they hadn't exhausted the BTFP after all.

So here's what I did instead. I went to Chartmill and ran this screen:

  • GICS: Financial.

  • Has options

  • U.S. only.

  • Health Rating: < 2 (on a scale from 0-10).

  • Piotroski F-Score: 2 or less (on a scale from 0-9).

  • Technical Rating: 4 or less (on a scale of 0-10).

Then I did a bit of research on the names that came up, to see if there were any potential bullish indicators on these banks that the screens missed.

An Ill-Fated Insider Purchase

There was a $25k insider purchase on one of these banks in March, but:

  • The shares are down ~28% since then.

  • And the bank missed its earnings in April.

So this insider doesn't appear to know much. And we've got two banks that look like real dogs for us to bet against.

Read the rest here


If you want to stay in touch.

You can scan for optimal hedges for individual securities, find our current top ten names, and create hedged portfolios on our website. You can also follow Portfolio Armor on X here, or become a free subscriber to our trading Substack using the link below (we're using that for our occasional emails now).

This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga's reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.

In general the bond market is volatile, and fixed income securities carry interest rate risk. (As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities.) Fixed income securities also carry inflation risk and credit and default risks for both issuers and counterparties. Unlike individual bonds, most bond funds do not have a maturity date, so avoiding losses caused by price volatility by holding them until maturity is not possible.

Lower-quality debt securities generally offer higher yields, but also involve greater risk of default or price changes due to potential changes in the credit quality of the issuer. Any fixed income security sold or redeemed prior to maturity may be subject to loss.

Before investing, consider the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact Fidelity for a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus containing this information. Read it carefully.